- Home
- Business & Marketing (833)
- Editorials (671)
- Entertainment (2033)
- Fashion (1032)
- Highbrid (189)
- Honeys (2876)
- Humor (948)
- Music (5222)
- Need to Know (2224)
- News (2076)
- Podcasts (4)
- ARCHIVE
Friday, February 6, 2009 | 1:51pm
[RANT] Is The Source’s Black History Talk an Anti-Hip Hop Ploy?
Has the once Bible of Hip Hop become a textbook under its new leadership?
With February marking the 83rd year since Carter G. Woodson “invented” the celebration of Black History Month, The Source, the once undisputed Bible of Hip Hop has dedicating its latest issue to the accomplishments of Black contributors.
While at first there might seem like nothing is wrong with that, its an indicator of a major paradigm shift at the historic magazine. Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you’re well aware of leadership turmoil, bankruptcy and ownership musical chairs at the magazine. Its all been well documented so I won’t elaborate.
The most recent ownership group championed by L. Londell McMillan, a media and entertainment lawyer and investment banker Jeffery Scott representing Black Enterprise Magazine’s interest took over the reigns in the summer of 2008. Together they helped The Source to emerge from bankruptcy essentially erase millions of dollars of debt, several lawsuits and other liabilities. While clearly very stable, McMillan and Scott’s vision has been a major cause for concern.
Two weeks ago we reported on the fact that the new owners would no longer accept so-called “booty ads” in the magazine. The move raised eyebrows not only because it limited their base of prospects from which to sell to but also was an indicator of the more mature standard they hoped to maintain for the magazine a standard upon which Hip Hop has never been held to except by CRITICS.
Now while honoring Black History has probably been a theme in February dating back to the magazine’s onset, The tone with which it’s addressed this time around is very suspect. Its almost as if the magazine is playing historian swooping in to teach the mindless under-educated, under motivated natives readers how to behave and what example to follow. While I might not be an advocate of much of what I see in hip hop today, I’ll still defend her especially when I see wolves in sheep’s clothing like the ones The Source has become under its new leadership.
“I’m on a mission to restore [The Source] to the community that gave birth to it and open the door to those that currently enjoy and influence that hip-hop culture,” Millan recently told the Huffington Post “It’s exciting because we believe that we can do it.”
While The Source at its pinnacle may have at times been immature and rebellious, so is the culture of Hip Hop and hence why its readers loved it so much. It was street and honest and at times vulgar but it encapsulated the essence of hip hop. The direction that Scott and McMillian hope to take the magazine is a reflection of what the older black generations hope or wished hip hop would always become and not what it needs to be in order to survive.
So while we respect the W.E.B. Dubois and Thurgood Marshalls of the world as Black History staples, the heroes of the Hip Hop culture are a much smaller, more radical subset who speak in slang and tend to wear their gear a little different. Hip Hop has never been the most sophisticated but its not stupid either. They’ll read through the new stuffy aristocratic focus of the revamped Source and they won’t buy in. If they’re smart enough to stop reading the magazine years ago, they’re smart enough to not pick it up this time. I for one won’t.
FILED IN Business & Marketing, Editorials, Need to Know



I cant wait to read why MLK is blacks folks only hero?
I made up the cover to prove the point lol.
Ironic The Source writing about black heros
MLK on the from and the booty pages in the back.
OUCH! I might need to offer my PR skills to The Source (of erroneous information). Good dig, Rico! And you’re not too shabby at Photoshop. I might hire YOU one day.
Yeah these guys are really killing hip hop softly. I just wish more people would realize it.
rico, lol
a leaflet
interesting… my first time here…first read.
i think the paradigm shift is for the aging 1st generation hip hop folks. those who are no longer “immature and rebellious” but still wish to be a part of the culture. i find it interesting even the youth of the culture call out the ills and wish the genre better, but when someone steps up to make an attempt at a fix, they bitch. good writing, but definitely short sighted.
I hear what you’re saying S. But remember where I’m coming from in Hip Hop; the mature end. Hip Hop can be mature and rebellious without being irresponsible. I think the magazine is attempting to be the death of Hip Hop while instead moving into the stuffy bourgeois Black Enterprise space. While I read Black Enterprise every month cover to cover clearly it does very little for the advancement of Hip Hop culture while only inspiring its enterprise. Thank you for your comments…please visit again.
Short sighted? This man just poured out his heart and you tryin’ to judge his opinion?!!!!!! No wonder you won’t put your real name.
finding the raising of the bar irresponsible is peculiar to me… not having booty ads and tackling something a bit deeper than someones street cred or a break down of lyrics about selling crack is irresponsible.. maybe im not getting the point of your piece. and zack, while he is totally entitiled to his opinion, so am i. i cant see the desire of a blogger as 100% agreement from the readers. then there would be no point. while i do not believe the source will find success with its new vision, i applaud them for trying.