• Home
  • Business & Marketing (833)
  • Editorials (671)
  • Entertainment (2033)
  • Fashion (1032)
  • Highbrid (189)
  • Honeys (2876)
  • Humor (948)
  • Music (5222)
  • Need to Know (2224)
  • News (2076)
  • Podcasts (4)
  • ARCHIVE
8 comments

Monday, December 1, 2008 | 1:05pm

RANT: Tyra Banks Begs the Question: What the Hell Is a ‘Mogul?’

Posted by Juan

For good reason Tyra rejects the ‘Mogul’ title but why is the word so over used?

Tyra on Ebony

In this new issue of Ebony magazine when asked about her status as a “mogul” Tyra Banks rejected the term saying that although she’s flattered when referred to as a media mogul she does not yet worthy of the title.

“Don’t get me wrong, ego-wise, when I see the cover of the magazines and they say that (I’m a mogul), I’m like, ‘Oh, that looks popping and it looks hot,’ but it ain’t true… Oprah‘s been doing this for 30 years. Mogul? That’s like Martha Stewart. That’s like going public. Mogul? Not yet,”

As we’ve begun to see black entreprenuers come up through the ranks and establish their business in the rehlm of entertainment we’ve come accustomed to hearing them referred to as “moguls.” Everyone from Diddy to Russell to 50 to Kimora Lee to Tyra to Nick Canon to T.I. to Akon to Pharrell to Lil Flip? How can they all be moguls? It seems all you need is two or more business ventures to be donned the overused moniker. But of those who have been bestowed such “honor” who among them can actually define exactly what one is?

A simple search in Webster’s dictionary reveals that the term either means “A very wealthy or powerful; an oil baron” or an Indian Muslim of or descended from one of several conquering groups of Mongol, Turkish, and Persian origin.” Clearly the first bears the closest resemblance.

But all the confusion begs the question, was this word adapted by the media and attributed to hip hop’s elite business men and women in effort to elevate them to a status of which they’re not worthy? I think here in lies the problem with Hip Hop society. Its a philosophy we simply call the “head gas.” Too often we over-celebrate in our culture. We praise black men for taking care of their kids, reward teenagers for staying out of jail, idolize newly elected presidents before they’ve stepped into office…this all leads to diminished standards.

We don’t expect more because we praise less. We call those who have accomplished very little moguls in effort to hold them on a pedestal as evidence to others of our collective progress. Sure there are some true bona fide role models within the entertainment industry who have made tremendous strides and blazed new paths but lets use Obama as an example.

Lets set the bar higher, celebrate less and achieve more. What we’ll begin to realize is the progress we’ve made is more extensive because its expected and the goals we acheive are far more fruitful.

FILED IN Business & Marketing, Editorials, Entertainment, Fashion, Honeys, Music

Tags: , ,

»
has blogged 3705 posts.

Contact this author »

8 Responses to RANT: Tyra Banks Begs the Question: What the Hell Is a ‘Mogul?’

  1. Good post. I agree with you for the most part. The way “mogul” is used now a days, You and I would both get to use the title. Which goes to show you how over used it is. Like Tyra said Oprah and Martha are moguls. The rest of us are just trying to get where they are.

    Little Known Fact: Nick Cannon happens to be a decedent of Mongolian Muslims ;)

  2. Zack says:

    I got a few gas station moguls in my neighborhood. But seriously, I wonder why you didn’t talk about a certain CEO of this blog who called Soulja Boy a mogul recently. Huh?
    (Yes, I’m a heckler but I do it with love)

  3. Pingback: » Kanye West Announces Intentions To INTERN in Fashion | Highbrid Nation | Because Knowledge is Power

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>